Module function conflicting with reserve function

[Peter Campbell]

On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 21:29:17 UTC, Stanislav Blinov 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 6 November 2018 at 21:19:29 UTC, Peter Campbell 
> wrote:
>
>> Given your second example that makes me think that, because 
>> object functions are provided by the runtime without me 
>> explicitly importing it, this is likely only an issue for 
>> object functions? Or can this behaviour happen with any free 
>> functions with the same name but completely different 
>> parameter types?
>
> Not with completely different parameter types, no. But it can 
> happen with functions imported from different modules, as 
> they're from different overload sets. There's an example in 
> that Overload Sets section of the spec.

I see what you both mean now and understand what's going on. 
Thanks for clearing it up