Why does nobody seem to think that `null` is a serious problem in D?

[NoMoreBugs]

On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 at 15:46:35 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 at 13:27:28 UTC, welkam wrote:
>> Because the more you learn about D the less you want to use 
>> classes.
>
> classes rock. You just initialize it. You're supposed to 
> initialize *everything* anyway.

a fan of classes...on the D forum? I don't get it.

but of course you are right. classes do rock!

In fact, there is not a better programming construct that I am 
aware of, the provides a better 'explicit' mapping from external 
objects to program constructs.

Thank you Kristen and Ole-Johan.