New With Struct and Getting Class Object Pointers
Vijay Nayar
madric at gmail.com
Wed Oct 3 07:05:19 UTC 2018
On Sunday, 30 September 2018 at 11:11:09 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
> On Sunday, 30 September 2018 at 09:30:38 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
>> Is there a way to either have a constant reference to a class
>> that can be set to a new value, or is there a way to convert
>> the class variable to a class pointer?
>
> Alex has mentioned Rebindable, which is the answer to your
> first question.
> To answer your second question, no
>
> class A {}
>
> A a:
>
> `a` is always a (possibly null) reference to a class instance.
> You can have pointers to class references (which is what `&a`
> gives you) but that has two indirections between the variable
> and the data, which if you want high perf is probably not what
> you are looking for.
Thanks everyone for the insight. I also finished reading
Jonathan's article:
http://jmdavisprog.com/articles/why-const-sucks.html
I've run into just about every single problem described there,
but had no idea just how deep the problem goes. So it was a
depressing read, but I'm glad to have the deeper understanding.
I'm definitely more open now to see what "__mutable" could offer
as was discussed at DConf2018, though I'm curious about how it
would remain compatible with "immutable".
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list