bug in compiles?

[Alex]

On Friday, 12 April 2019 at 00:02:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 23:55:18 UTC, Alex wrote:
>
>> to judge people objectively. This isn't a nursery school and 
>> we are not 3 year olds...
>
> Exactly. So start behaving like a grown-up and professional.
>
> When you ask someone for help on the street, do you curse at 
> him too?

Um, where the hell did I "curse" at him? See, you are making up 
shit. Prove it! The posts are recorded!

See, you do want this to a nursery school... You want your little 
rules and regulations and no cursing or you'll get soap in your 
mouth.


You want to act like a grown up but you don't wanna be a grown 
up. Being a grown up sometimes requires you to not respond to 
people that you don't like. Yet you did! In the real world when 
someone says shit you don't like and you say shit back and then 
claim your in the right when you do the exact same shit doesn't 
cut it.

See, you decided to become part of this problem... because you 
are part of the problem.  You had nothing useful to say, nothing 
factual, nothing to add intelligently but you just decided on 
your own that you wanted to take sides play these little games.


"Must be something else in your code because it works fine for me 
with this shortened example.
>
> https://run.dlang.io/is/o8xESB

Seriously? Do you think you have ESP? Your code isn't even close 
to was talking about ;/

Here is is updated that shows the error. You seem to fail to 
understand that it is impossible for it to be my code. There is 
no way the static if should fail yet the static foreach pass. 
They both go together, that is is the whole point of the static 
if, to make sure the foreach works, yet it says it doesn't work 
when it in fact does(as commenting out the line proves)."

I asked him if he thinks he has ESP, was that cursing him? I told 
him his code isn't close to what I was talking about, is that 
cursing?

I'm asking a damn question and making a statement. I was trying 
to explain to him that there is no way in hell that he could be 
right(well, there is a small chances but why would he assume 
that?) because he of the nature of the problem.

No where did I cuss him, attack him personally... it's something 
you guys decided to interpret as then you get offended and cause 
problems and you don't like me telling you to fuck off for saying 
I'm causing problems when you are causing problems.

See, you guys are the source. You think your job is to police the 
world because you are special. If Bauss got offended or didn't 
like my town then he can chose to not respond to me ever again, 
that solve that problem.

See, if I'm so fucking hostile to everyone and everyone never 
responds to me, guess the fuck what? No one responds, no 
problems. At most I could flood the site with useless posts or 
some shit like that(which I wouldn't do)..

But instead, what happens is people like you that think you are 
do-gooders and you are going to save the world from ilk like me 
only make things worse. That is typical of people like you(which 
I say because you have proven you are that type of person by 
responding rather than just ignoring). At least if you had 
something useful to say then maybe it would matter.

Instead, you say I am slinging poop and that gives you the right 
to sling poop back... but you also claim you are on the moral 
high ground.

Now, that is my assessment of the situation. I claim it is based 
on facts. You can object, but you have the right to just STFU and 
let other people STFU. But I imagine you will want to continue 
being part of the problem.

Seriously, what do you think will come out of your comments? They 
have no substance that can possibly have any good outcome. It's 
just like the shit I have said here, except my goal is to get you 
to realize that you are not contributing to the solution. Same as 
Parker with his need to police the the world. Do you really think 
it will make things better?