Question about ubyte x overflow, any safe way?
Patrick.Schluter at bbox.fr
Mon Aug 5 19:32:49 UTC 2019
On Monday, 5 August 2019 at 18:21:36 UTC, matheus wrote:
> On Monday, 5 August 2019 at 01:41:06 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> Two examples with foreach and ranges. The 'ubyte.max + 1'
>> expression is int. The compiler casts to ubyte (because we
>> typed ubyte) in the foreach and we cast to ubyte in the range:
> Maybe it was a bad example of my part (Using for), and indeed
> using foreach would solve that specific issue, but what I'm
> really looking for if there is a flag or a way to check for
> overflow when assigning some variable.
> ubyte u = 260; // Here should be given some warning or throw
> It's ubyte, but it could be any other data type.
Yes, no question. It's checkedint that you should use. It was
written exactly for that purpose.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn