Abstract classes vs interfaces, casting from void*
sascha.orlov at gmail.com
Sun Aug 11 15:16:03 UTC 2019
On Sunday, 11 August 2019 at 13:09:43 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
>> Ok. What would go wrong (in D) if I just replaced every
>> interface with an abstract class?
> I think there's some confusion here, because B.foo is not
> abstract. abstract on a class is not inherited by its methods.
Now, I'm confused, as you asked about abstract classes. So, yes,
you can define the abstractness of classes differently. And what
is your point?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn