Is there a nice syntax to achieve optional named parameters?
john.burton at jbmail.com
Tue Jan 15 12:49:20 UTC 2019
On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 12:15:41 UTC, rikki cattermole
> On 16/01/2019 1:05 AM, John Burton wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 11:26:50 UTC, rikki cattermole
>>> Longer term, you're better off with the builder.
>> Thanks for your reply. But what is the builder?
> One of the few OOP design patterns that I can agree with.
Ah right, that.
Hmm that would work.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn