Is there a nice syntax to achieve optional named parameters?

Dukc ajieskola at gmail.com
Wed Jan 16 11:23:21 UTC 2019

Previous message: Is there a nice syntax to achieve optional named parameters?
Next message: Is there a nice syntax to achieve optional named parameters?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wednesday, 16 January 2019 at 11:21:53 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> a template that takes a single struct of arbitrary,

meant "of arbitrary type"

Previous message: Is there a nice syntax to achieve optional named parameters?
Next message: Is there a nice syntax to achieve optional named parameters?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list