Operator Overloading with multiple return types
H. S. Teoh
hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx
Fri Mar 15 23:39:19 UTC 2019
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 04:29:22PM -0700, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On 03/15/2019 03:48 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > Ali's example was unfortunately deceptively formatted.
>
> My editor did that. :)
This is why I don't trust auto-formatters. ;-)
> On my work computer, I've been experimenting with pulling the 'if',
> 'in', etc to the same level as the function signature:
>
> int foo(T)(T t)
> if (isBlah!T)
> in (!t.empty) {
> // ...
> }
[...]
Phobos style also dictates that:
int foo(T)(T t)
if (isBlah!T)
in (!t.empty)
{
...
}
In my own code, however, I find it too block-of-text-y, so I prefer to
indent it inwards:
int foo(T)(T t)
if (isBlah!T)
in (!t.empty)
{
...
}
But if your style puts { at the end of the line rather than the
beginning, this could make it even easier to confuse for a statement
inside the body.
So YMMV.
T
--
IBM = I'll Buy Microsoft!
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list