On Friday, 17 May 2019 at 18:36:00 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote: > I'd suggest "17 ms, and 553.1µs" for a better default (1 hns is > 0.1 µs, right?). No weird "hnsecs", no false precision, still > all the data that is there. I was going to propose the same. Hns is weird. Bastiaan.