Documentation: is it intentional that template constraints are displayed after the signature?

[Dennis]

Template constraints are not allowed before the signature in the 
language, so it can be expected the documentation does not swap 
that order.

On Thursday, 31 October 2019 at 13:34:35 UTC, Tobias Pankrath 
wrote:
> I was confused at first by the trailing
>
>  if (!is(T == struct) && !is(T == interface) && !is(T == class) 
> && !__traits(isStaticArray, T));

Or are you confused by the newline between the ) and the if?
I do think the indentation is a bit confusing, but I don't know a 
better one.
I always have difficulty myself when trying to cleanly format 
long signatures of template functions.