Idiomatic way to write a range that tracks how much it consumes
jond at noreply.com
Mon Apr 27 05:45:26 UTC 2020
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 04:41:58 UTC, drug wrote:
> 27.04.2020 06:38, Jon Degenhardt пишет:
>> Is there a better way to write this?
> I don't know a better way, I think you enlist all possible ways
> - get a value using either `front` or special range member. I
> prefer the second variant, I don't think it is less consistent
> with range paradigms. Considering you need amount of consumed
> bytes only when range is empty the second way is more effective.
Thanks. Of two, I like the second better as well.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn