Flatten a range of static arrays

ag0aep6g anonymous at example.com
Sat Feb 8 18:20:03 UTC 2020


On 08.02.20 15:57, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> This kind of stuff is so difficult to reason about and develop as a 
> library that people will just end up removing dip1000 from their 
> compilation.

I 100% agree that DIP 1000 is hard to reason about. It's pretty limited 
by design, and the implementation has so many bugs. If anyone has a 
better design (and implementation), I'd be all for that.

About just ditching the compiler switch: Then you can't even take the 
address of a local. Also, it's going to become the default eventually.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list