Flatten a range of static arrays
ag0aep6g
anonymous at example.com
Sat Feb 8 18:20:03 UTC 2020
On 08.02.20 15:57, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> This kind of stuff is so difficult to reason about and develop as a
> library that people will just end up removing dip1000 from their
> compilation.
I 100% agree that DIP 1000 is hard to reason about. It's pretty limited
by design, and the implementation has so many bugs. If anyone has a
better design (and implementation), I'd be all for that.
About just ditching the compiler switch: Then you can't even take the
address of a local. Also, it's going to become the default eventually.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list