D Mir: standard deviation speed
tastyminerals at gmail.com
Wed Jul 15 07:34:59 UTC 2020
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:57:21 UTC, 9il wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:55:51 UTC, 9il wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 06:00:46 UTC, tastyminerals
>>> On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 02:08:48 UTC, 9il wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 at 19:04:45 UTC, tastyminerals
>>>>> @fastmath private double sd0(T)(Slice!(T*, 1) flatMatrix)
>>>> @fastmath shouldn't be really used with summation algorithms
>>>> except the `"fast"` version of them. Otherwise, they may or
>>>> may not behave like "fast".
>>> Good to know. So, it's fine to use it with sum!"fast" but
>>> better avoid it for general purposes.
>> They both are more precise by default.
> This was a reply to the other your post in the thread, sorry.
> Mir algorithms are more precise by default then the algorithms
> you have provided.
Right. Is this why standardDeviation is significantly slower?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn