lambdas with types

[jmh530]

On Friday, 20 November 2020 at 14:57:42 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:47:52PM +0000, Paul Backus via 
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
>> In this specific case, you could also make `foo` a type-safe 
>> variadic function [1], which would eliminate the need for 
>> `allSatisfy`:
>> 
>>     void foo(double[] args...)
>>     {
>>         // ...
>>     }
> [...]
>
> Yes, and this will also eliminate the template bloat associated 
> with .foo, which would have been instantiated once per call 
> with a different number of arguments.  But of course, this only 
> works if all arguments are of the same type, and if the 
> function body does not depend on accessing the number of 
> arguments at compile-time.
>
>
> T

Thanks all.

The template conditions I'm working on are complicated enough 
that this approach might work for some but not all. However, if I 
split out the function I'm working on into a separate one, then I 
might be able to take advantage of that.