Is garbage detection a thing?

[Mark]

> Elimination of memory problems is much more valuable than 
> detection. Recovering from memory errors at run time is 
> unreliable.

I'm not sure but I have a gut feeling that I am just in a 
position that is not good to defend. I want small software that 
fails hard on weak causes, and the industry wants software that 
fails soft on strong causes. I cannot win any argument and will, 
as hobbyist who likes elegant code, face frustration after 
frustration, admittedly in all digital products, not only 
compilers.

I'm sure you're right. Elimination of memory problems is what 
must be provided. I agree.

> The advantage of D is that all options are open. This allows 
> the following approach:
> ...
> ...
> This makes starting a project in D a safe choice, in multiple 
> meanings of the word.
>
> — Bastiaan.

Thanks! :) Well, in the end, there should be a way like this.