I think Associative Array should throw Exception

Jesse Phillips Jesse.K.Phillips+D at gmail.com
Fri Sep 4 05:48:30 UTC 2020

On Thursday, 3 September 2020 at 15:12:14 UTC, Steven 
Schveighoffer wrote:
> int[int] aa;
> aa[4] = 5;
> auto b = aa[4];
> How is this code broken? It's valid, will never throw, and 
> there's no reason that we should break it by adding an 
> exception into the mix.

int foo() nothrow {
     return "1".to!int;

The following code is valid, will never throw, why does the 
compiler prevent it?

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list