Why private methods cant be virtual?
Simen Kjærås
simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 14:00:40 UTC 2020
On Tuesday, 22 September 2020 at 13:19:10 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> So final private functions can be overriden? It seems not, but
> the sentence is definitely confusing if not just plain wrong.
Yeah. I've seen this called hiding, shadowing and overwriting
earlier, but never overriding - that's always been reserved for
the polymorphic kind.
I'd argue the documentation should use one of those other terms.
> And yes compiler probably could findout that method could be
> made
> non-virtual but I am not sure how easy is this and how it would
> slow down
> compilation times
Steve showed a few posts up one example that would make it
basically impossible. Other language features make it even worse:
class A { private void fun() {} }
class B(string s) : A { mixin(s); }
--
Simen
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list