D has the same memory model as C++

[Tejas]

On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 21:19:39 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 August 2021 at 16:00:37 UTC, Tejas wrote:
>> Basically, what are the subtle gotcha's in the differences 
>> between C++ and D code that looks similar
>
> The only gotcha that comes to my mind is that `private` means 
> private to the module in D, not private to the aggregate.
>
> — Bastiaan.

A few others that I know:

When importing one module(say ```m2```) into another (say 
```m1```), the symbols of ```m1``` aren't automatically visible 
in ```m2```. You must import ```m1``` in ```m2``` for that.

You can't just initialize variables willy-nilly in a module, you 
must do them inside ```static this()```

Method function pointers don't exist in D, equivalent 
functionality is achieved by using a delegate that captures the 
context of a class instantiated object.

To use a function pointer explicitly, you can't just write 
```(func)(arguments)```, it is ```(&func)(arguments)```(thank you 
evilrat)

```sizeof/alignof``` differs in D and C++(thank you evilrat)