Labelled @nogc Working With Inner Scopes

[Benoît Dubreuil]

On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 20:58:01 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion on the question but I tend to 
> agree with the current behavior because it's easy to add the 
> attributes anyway.

On Tuesday, 31 August 2021 at 00:36:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> Attributes used to propagate into aggregate definitions, but it 
> was changed a long time ago. I don't recall the reason why.

Thank you both for your answers. Subjectively, it seems easy to 
forget to manually repeat labelled attribute statements. I guess 
I'll just use attributes directly on declarations instead.


On Monday, 30 August 2021 at 20:58:01 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> Going off topic, I want to mention that the 'in' and 'out' 
> contracts have a simpler syntax now and that the 'do' (or 
> 'body') keyword is optional in that place:

Great, thanks. I was also searching how to separate multiple 
contracts for the same function, so it answered this other 
question.