This is bug or not? (immutable class containing struct with dtor)
notrealemail at gmail.com
Fri Dec 17 18:34:02 UTC 2021
On Friday, 17 December 2021 at 18:19:34 UTC, Denis Feklushkin
> On Friday, 17 December 2021 at 18:01:03 UTC, Tejas wrote:
>> I think since `immutable` objects are kept in Read Only Storage
> Some of them can be stored in ROM in some cases, but actually
> "immutable" keyword means "not mutable for whole its lifetime"
Well, it would be really weird if destructors successfully
executed for some class of `immutable` qualified objects but
didn't for others.
Not too much of a stretch to imagine that destruction for
immutable objects was outright disallowed.
Someone who can explain this behaviour more thoroughly would be
much appreciated 😊
Maybe we should allow finalizers to mutate their instance?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn