associative array with Parallel

[frame]

On Thursday, 22 July 2021 at 06:47:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:

> But even if it did, we wouldn't want synchronized blocks in 
> parallelization because a synchronized block would run a single 
> thread at a time and nothing would be running in parallel 
> anymore.

But it only affects the block, the other code could still run in 
parallel till this point is reached from any thread.

Well, I just have assumed that the compiler does a conversion 
here knowing the parallel stuff. Of course there is no room for 
such a feature if the compiler only converts the foreach body as 
a delegate for the opApply() method. Thanks for clarification.