dlang vs crystal-language

[Imperatorn]

On Wednesday, 5 May 2021 at 18:50:05 UTC, Alain De Vos wrote:
> On Friday, 30 April 2021 at 14:16:16 UTC, Vinod K Chandran 
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 28 April 2021 at 22:41:03 UTC, Alain De Vos 
>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Pros of **Crystal**
>> 1. Attractive syntax. I like Ruby like syntax. It's really 
>> expressive.
>>
>> Cons of Crystal
>> 1. It doesn't have a compiler for Windows. It uses WSL based 
>> compiler and I think it's a bad idea.
>>
>> I don't think I need to tell the pros & cons of **D lang** in 
>> it's own forum.
>> BTW, I wonder to see someone says that they have succeeded in 
>> compiling a **tkD** example code. I tried it with no luck. So 
>> I gave up that idea.
>
> What's wrong with WSL. I think it is a great idea.

Maybe he meant WSL is good, but relying on it for Windows support 
is suboptimal. I kinda agree