Why writeln can't be converted to nothrow with just catching of StdioException
aldacron at gmail.com
Mon Feb 21 11:18:58 UTC 2022
On Monday, 21 February 2022 at 11:11:28 UTC, partypooper wrote:
> So with such behavior there is no reason at all to make make
> function nothrow, if it uses throw functions in its body?
I'm not sure what you mean. If a function throws an exception, it
can't be nothrow.
> And as much as I already know compliler can deduce and
> automatically adds nothrow to all functions which do not throw
> exceptions. Right?
Function attribute inference is done in specific circumstances,
but not for all functions. See
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn