Comparing Exceptions and Errors
kdevel
kdevel at vogtner.de
Thu Jun 16 10:07:23 UTC 2022
On Wednesday, 15 June 2022 at 20:46:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> [...]
> It has not harmed my code though. I tried throwing inside a
> scope guard, and it.... just works, I'm not sure why you can't
> throw in those?
You can but that is not acceptable for the spec explicitly
forbids that:
https://dlang.org/spec/statement.html#scope-guard-statement
Quote (again): "A [...] scope(success) statement may not exit
with a throw [...]."
Furthermore I always thought of scope guards as a means for
cleanup. Cleanup implies in my eyes removing things which have
been used in a previous task. This intended use is documented
here:
https://tour.dlang.org/tour/en/gems/scope-guards
Using scope guards makes code much cleaner and allows
resource allocation
and clean up code to be placed next to each other. These
little helpers also
improve safety because they make sure certain cleanup code is
always called
independent of which paths are actually taken at runtime.
Performing a COMMIT is rather the opposite of cleanup: It makes
(writes) changes to the database persistent.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list