Hipreme's #4 Tip of the day - Don't use package.d

[z]

On Friday, 4 November 2022 at 10:57:12 UTC, Hipreme wrote:
> ...

What do we use instead?
I won't lie about the fact package.d forced me to workaround 
elusive "bugs" in my usage(1) but what is the alternative if we 
don't want to work around it?

(1)(ime : had cases of package.d requiring compiler specific 
pragmas for LDC, and dub can't find the package's `source` files 
at all if it's a multi file subpackage intended to be imported 
only, i never got it working with `package.d`, only a single 
source file setup `*packagename*.d` would work...)