Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
therealbluepandabear at protonmail.com
Mon Feb 6 02:25:47 UTC 2023
> I do not agree, that a compiler that allows a programmer to
> misuse a type, should be seen as 'a feature'.
> If that's the kind of 'power' D programmers want, then D is not
> for me.
Eh, I don't think I would _quit_ D because of this issue, but
it's definitely something that bothers me (more so the lack of an
ecosystem) especially since I come from a .NET/JVM background.
I'm pretty shocked this isn't a feature tbh.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn