Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
acehreli at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 6 08:30:41 UTC 2023
On 2/5/23 17:50, thebluepandabear wrote:
> I don't see why you'd want
I am not saying it would be wanted or needed.
> to expose a static class/namespace as a
> variable, or any of such similar things. That would give no benefits to
> the programmer?
Perhaps. As I responded to ProtectAndHide, if there is a benefit then it
is useful by definition; if there is no benefit then it wouldn't be used
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn