Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

zjh fqbqrr at 163.com
Thu Feb 9 13:32:36 UTC 2023


On Thursday, 9 February 2023 at 13:07:56 UTC, thebluepandabear 
wrote:

> yeah the whole module behaviour with `private` is just a 
> massive turn off tbh, it needs to be changed to match the Java 
> style


They don't even admit the smaller the encapsulation, the better.



More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list