Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
no at spam.net
Fri Feb 10 14:50:59 UTC 2023
On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 07:04:31 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
> Having class-private doesn't preclude module-private. Dennis
> even submitted a PR implementing class-private, but it stalled
> because people couldn't agree on whether class-private should
> be "private to class" or "private to class instance".
This is a great example of the problem. In a discussion of any
five programmers, you'll have five conflicting sets of rules that
are the obvious and intuitive way to do it.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn