Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

thebluepandabear thereabluepandabear at
Sat Feb 11 03:26:17 UTC 2023

> For a language that claims to supprot OOP, and does public by 
> default, and no way to declare type private... I mean... wow!

agree, it should definitely be `private` by default... if 
`private` was implemented properly lmao

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list