Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

ProtectAndHide ProtectAndHide at
Mon Feb 13 20:25:07 UTC 2023

On Monday, 13 February 2023 at 09:14:18 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Monday, 13 February 2023 at 08:22:06 UTC, ProtectAndHide 
> wrote:
>> Chris Lattner outlines the reasons for removing it in Swift 
>> 3.0 here:
> So your complaint is that you agree with Chris Lattner and 
> disagree with others?

I was just responding to your comment about '++'.

What is your point? That I should not complain about not being 
able to 'declare' type private? (in a language that says it 
support OOP).

My request is not odd. What is odd, is the complete and utter 
rejection of it ;-)

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list