Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[thebluepandabear]

On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 10:16:47 UTC, ProtectAndHide 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 14 February 2023 at 08:15:37 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
>> My point is you know you're just picky.
>
> Well.. it seems to me, that your 'point' is to just have a go 
> at me.
>
> In any case, there is nothing 'picky' about wanting to be able 
> to explicately 'declare' a member of my class type as being 
> private. That to me, is what a programmer should expect to be 
> able to do in a language that says it supports OOP.
>
> Further nonsense towards me will be ignored ;-)

fight fight fight fight

jk