Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[ProtectAndHide]

On Wednesday, 15 February 2023 at 08:56:00 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>
> Our friend of many forum handles misses no opportunity to 
> return to this putrid horse corpse to beat it some more, but 
> the meaning of private isn't going to change. This is D's 
> approach to encapsulation.

It seems the only beating go on here, is the beating your handing 
out.

If someone raises a comment about type private, and you all jump 
in any beat on him, then who is the real victim here?

Try to keep it about language design, and stop getting personal.