Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

Mike Parker aldacron at gmail.com
Thu Feb 16 02:27:23 UTC 2023

Previous message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Next message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 02:26:44 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:

> Wrong. I'm arguing  things:

Geez. "I'm arguing 2 things:"

Previous message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Next message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list