Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

zjh fqbqrr at 163.com
Sat Feb 18 07:15:39 UTC 2023

Previous message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Next message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Saturday, 18 February 2023 at 06:55:49 UTC, ProtectAndHide 
wrote:
>
> No, I think D is not for me.


They don't care about the needs of `D` users!
They won't listen ,even if you said it thousand times.

Previous message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Next message: Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn mailing list