Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[thebluepandabear]

On Sunday, 19 February 2023 at 00:21:42 UTC, ProtectAndHide wrote:
> On Saturday, 18 February 2023 at 21:23:24 UTC, ProtectAndHide 
> wrote:
>>
>> The more I look at D, the more I like C++.
>
> I should correct that.
>
> The more I look at D, the more I like C++, C#, Java, Kotlin, 
> Swift, Javascript .. and the list goes on..
>
> All D needed to provide, was a way to let the programmer 
> declare a private member inside a class. But that is too much 
> for the language to handle, and so objectionable to many D 
> users, that it will never happen. I have no problem with that, 
> because, i really do have many other options - as do all the 
> C++, C#, Java, Kotlin, Swift, Javascript .. and the list goes 
> on..that you supposedly want to attract to D (although, I 
> suspect nobody actually wants to attract them, since they'll 
> expect to be able to declare a private member within a class.
>
> So.. good luck with the .. ummm.. D thing.

Based. I've already switched to TypeScript, Java, etc. Goodbye D.