Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[FeepingCreature]

On Monday, 20 February 2023 at 05:21:44 UTC, forky wrote:
> On Friday, 10 February 2023 at 07:04:31 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> Having class-private doesn't preclude module-private. Dennis 
>> even submitted a PR implementing class-private, but it stalled 
>> because people couldn't agree on whether class-private should 
>> be "private to class" or "private to class instance".
>
> It likely the 'disagreement' was intentional .. i.e. to stall 
> ;-)
>
> But in any case, it should be class private.

There have now been three pages produced by three people all 
agreeing with each other.

At what point does it start being spam?