Is there a way to enforce UFCS?

[bauss]

On Wednesday, 4 January 2023 at 03:42:28 UTC, thebluepandabear 
wrote:
> ...
>
> My question is: is there a way to enforce UFCS-syntax?

None of your code actually uses UFCS.

This is UFCS:

```
class Foo {
   int bar;
}

void setBar(Foo foo, int value) {
   foo.bar = value;
}

void main() {
   foo.setBar(100); // UFCS
   setBar(foo, 100); // Non-UFCS (Above expands to this)
}
```

This is not UFCS but just class method calling:

```
class Foo {
   int bar;

   void setBar(Foo foo, int value) {
     foo.bar = value;
   }
}

void main() {
   foo.setBar(100); // Not UFCS - just method call to the class
   foo.setBar = 100; // Not UFCS - simply a setter function call 
(equal to the above)
   setBar(foo, 100); // Error
}
```

Also note that @property doesn't really do anything now and 
there's even talk about deprecating it. Althought I personally 
still use it, then it doesn't have much of a function and none of 
your code is affected if you remove it.