Non-ugly ways to implement a 'static' class or namespace?

[Mike Parker]

On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 00:11:17 UTC, thebluepandabear 
wrote:

>
> Sorry don't like that solution specifically. That's because it 
> is a procedural implementation, not an OOP-style one. I don't 
> know how much of the D community writes procedurally but I'm 
> personally an OOP-type of guy.

A class full of static methods is not OOP either.