Which D compiler is the most maintained and future-proof? [DMD GDC and LDC]

[Ernesto Castellotti]

On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 13:51:18 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew 
Cattermole wrote:
> On 25/07/2023 1:26 AM, devosalain wrote:
>> I could be interesting to also compare the licenses of the 3 
>> compilers.
>
> There isn't a huge difference between them.
>
> The frontend, druntime and most of phobos (minus zlib and curl) 
> are all Boost regardless of compiler.
>
> That just leaves backends, which depends upon GCC and LLVM. So 
> if you can use GCC and Clang, your fine to use GDC and LDC.

As far as I know any contribution to GCC has to be done under a 
GPLv3 compatible license (like Boost) and then it's all 
redistributed under GPLv3+Runtime Exception clause despite having 
other licenses previously.
So GDC since it went mainline GCC should be distributed under 
GPLv3.