Thread/Task cancellation
Ruby The Roobster
michaeleverestc79 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 28 20:13:24 UTC 2023
On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 18:52:59 UTC, Ruby The Roobster wrote:
> On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 18:17:18 UTC, Gjiergji wrote:
>> I am coming from a C# background. I understood that there is
>> no async/await equivalent in D (except fibers which are not
>> suitable for multi threading), but if I am using threads, what
>> is the D idiom to implement cancellation?
>>
>> Usually a long running thread looks like this (in C#):
>>
>> ```csharp
>> try
>> {
>> while (!cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested)
>> {
>> //do some work
>> await SomethingAsync(cancellationToken);
>> //do some other work
>> await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5000),
>> cancellationToken);
>> }
>> }
>> catch (OperationCancelledException e) when (e.Token ==
>> cancellationToken)
>> {
>> //someone cancelled any of the await calls above, we can
>> swallow it or log it
>> }
>>
>> ```
>>
>> The question is how do I pass a `cancellationToken` to the
>> calls from the loop in order to terminate them before
>> completion. For example, I learnt about `Thread.sleep` in
>> phobos, but I cannot pass a cancellation token in order to
>> cancel it before the intended sleep duration.
>>
>> Thx.
>
> [SNIP]
> You could use a thread to check if the token has been sent via
> message passing, and when it is sent, throw an exception, like
> this:
>
>
> This does however, terminate with signal 11 upon sending the
> terminate signal, and I'm not sure why.
Ignore my above code, Here is something that should work:
```d
import std.concurrency;
void foo()
{
try
{
auto tid = spawnLinked(&bar);
ownerTid.send(tid);
// do stuff
// ...
auto c = receiveTimeout(0.msecs, (ubyte a) {}); // Since
bar is linked, this will throw an exception when bar terminates
}
catch(Exception e)
{
// Do whatever with the exception message, but it
terminates the function execution.
}
}
void bar()
{
bool terminate = false;
terminate = receiveOnly!bool();
}
void main()
{
spawn(&foo);
Tid tid = receiveOnly!Tid();
// ...
if(needsToTerminateFooForSomeReason)
tid.send(true);
// ...
}
```
This is the only way I could think of doing this, since
exceptions don't travel up the threads.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list