Providing implicit conversion of
Danilo
codedan at aol.com
Tue Jan 23 00:49:45 UTC 2024
On Monday, 22 January 2024 at 19:49:19 UTC, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
> Additionally taking care of unsigned overflows would surely
> require more changes, but I doubt that they are going to be big.
If it would cause too much problems, it could be behind
a compiler switch `-strict`, which I would enable by default.
Maybe there is already such a flag for not allowing implicit
`unsigned <> signed` conversion?
Important stuff if we want to go onto a mission to Mars. ;)
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list