<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 08:54, Simen kjaeraas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:simen.kjaras@gmail.com">simen.kjaras@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">Duke Normandin <<a href="mailto:dukeofperl@ml1.net" target="_blank">dukeofperl@ml1.net</a>> wrote:<br>
<br></div><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">[sidebar]<br>
Why is every D tutorial I've touched upon so far, been frigged up?<br>
This is NOT good advocacy, people! Bad advertising! Where is the good<br>
stuff hiding? L8r...<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
One of the reasons probably is the D1/D2 schism. D1 was, in a way, a<br>
hastily chosen point at which to call the language stable. Because<br>
it has been a stable version of the language for three years, D1 has<br>
been the subject of most tutorials, while D2 has been a moving target<br>
and thus any tutorial written for it would soon be outdated.<br>
Hopefully, this situation will change as D2 becomes more stable (it<br>
actually is fairly stable already).<br></blockquote><div><br>We could wait a month or two, to let the dust settle and then have go at cleaning tutorials?<br><br> <br></div></div>