not operator operator..
kris
foo at bar.com
Mon Apr 3 22:21:21 PDT 2006
S. Chancellor wrote:
> I really really hate the !in, !is syntax. I think a lot of other
> people do too. I propose that the word not, become an operator on
> operators. For example:
>
> Foo not is null
> Foo not in Bar
>
> This not keyword will only function when it is part of these expressions:
>
> EqualExpression
> RelExpression
> InExpression
>
> As a consequence the following would be valid:
>
> Foo not == Bar
> Foo not <= Bar
D !is BASIC
;-)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list