not operator operator..

S. Chancellor dnewsgr at mephit.kicks-ass.org
Tue Apr 4 06:14:20 PDT 2006


On 2006-04-04 01:46:01 -0700, Anders F Björklund <afb at algonet.se> said:

> Don Clugston wrote:
> 
>>> Ehrm, wasn't '===' changed to 'is' exactly because it was more readable?
>> 
>> I thought it was because === was almost indistinguishable from == with 
>> some international fonts.
> 
> Yes, I guess that would qualify as "unreadable" when using such a font.
> 
> :-)
> 
> --anders

!is is pretty hard to read to me.  I hate having the ! next to the i.




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list