not operator operator..
S. Chancellor
dnewsgr at mephit.kicks-ass.org
Tue Apr 4 06:14:20 PDT 2006
On 2006-04-04 01:46:01 -0700, Anders F Björklund <afb at algonet.se> said:
> Don Clugston wrote:
>
>>> Ehrm, wasn't '===' changed to 'is' exactly because it was more readable?
>>
>> I thought it was because === was almost indistinguishable from == with
>> some international fonts.
>
> Yes, I guess that would qualify as "unreadable" when using such a font.
>
> :-)
>
> --anders
!is is pretty hard to read to me. I hate having the ! next to the i.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list