not operator operator..

[Derek Parnell]

On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:37:40 +0300, Georg Wrede wrote:

> Derek Parnell wrote:
>> Regan Heath wrote:
>>> Georg Wrede

>>>> If D really _demands_ source code to be in UTF, then there is no
>>>> excuse for avoiding single-character operators like "≡".
>>> 
>>> Except that they're not easily acessable on a common/standard
>>> keyboard, right?
>> 
>> What? You mean you're *not* using the standard 473-key keyboard? How 
>> strange !?
> 
> If somebody is able to produce "≡", then let him define it. All we need 
> is some suitable syntax.

I'm sorry Georg, I wasn't disapproving of your idea, I was just making a
lame joke about needing a large keyboard to make such an idea easy-to-use.
In fact, I like the idea of being able to define new operators, but then I
love Forth too ;-)

-- 
Derek
(skype: derek.j.parnell)
Melbourne, Australia
"Down with mediocracy!"
5/04/2006 10:55:09 AM