auto classes and finalizers

[Mike Capp]

In article <e1dfmc$29r2$1 at digitaldaemon.com>, Don Clugston says...
>kris wrote:
>> Mike Capp wrote:
>>> Um... can we avoid using "implicit" and "explicit" in this context? 
>>
>> Yeah, I see the murk. What would you prefer to call them? 
>
>deterministic and non-deterministic.

Yes. Which pretty much correspond to "important" and "don't care".

cheers
Mike