C++ vs. D memory management performance (Was: Faster Virtual Method Dispatch)
Craig Black
cblack at ara.com
Fri Apr 28 21:25:23 PDT 2006
Please allow me to ask a stupid question. Why are there three benchmarks
for each version? Are you testing on different computers or something?
>The most amazing thing here is the dramatic performance difference
>between these D runs and the previous ones. I won't speculate on why,
>bu the exact same app appears to be running 3 times as fast as it did
>this morning.
That is very strange ... so it seems that these benchmarks, being
inconsistent, were inconclusive. Sounds like we need more testing. Anyway,
D came out on top that time so that is good news!
>Finally, as these tests were quite informal I don't suggest reading too
>much into them.
Agreed. Benchmarking one small program doesn't really say much.
>However I think a reasonable conclusion would be that D
>is faster than C++ for typical user applications
I would agree, but not just based on a single benchmark.
-Craig
-Craig
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list