The future of lambda delegates

[Stewart Gordon]

Mikola Lysenko wrote:
<snip>
>     return
>     {
>         int c = a + b;     // Calculate the next term in the sequence
>         a = b;               // Shift the previous terms back
>         b = c;
>         return c;            // Return the result
>     };
<snip>

Is it my imagination, or does this create yet another ambiguity in the D 
syntax?

     { ... } + 69;

Is this one ExpressionStatement containing an AddExpression, or a 
BlockStatement followed by an ExpressionStatement containing a 
UnaryExpression?  OK, so neither makes semantic sense, but it still 
needs defining at the syntactic level.

Stewart.